The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Column: Why I still believe in Lance Armstrong

Having come to know the controversial cycling superstar, former Clare hurler Tony Griffin says he does not feel let down by the ‘human, flawed’ Armtrong.

Tony Griffin

Former All Star hurler Tony Griffin got to know seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong through his charity work. And the Clareman — who runs the Soar Foundation — says it doesn’t matter to him if the controversial American doped during his cycling career. Here’s why:

At the gates of his home we met Armstrong, about to tackle the morning school run. He rolled his window down, shot us a smile, we shook hands and he welcomed us to Austin. In the back seat were his twin daughters, one of whom was teary. ’She’s upset to have to leave her piglet behind’, he explained. ‘See ya’ll in five.’ When he arrived back I thanked him for agreeing to spend time with us.
‘Don’t worry’, he said. ‘We did a good background check on you. By the way, how come you hurlers don’t get paid?’ I decided to tackle that one as we rolled out on to the sun-drenched Austin roads for our bike ride. As we set off I caught Lance staring at our bikes, which we had rented earlier that morning at a downtown Austin bike store. Chris Brewer, Armstrong’s close friend, had picked us up at the airport and when we told him that the bike company Trek had not returned our emails or calls he encouraged us to rent a particular brand of bike that Armstrong disliked.
Finally Lance broke the silence, ‘Where d’you get those pieces of crap?

‘This is all we have’, I said. ‘Trek won’t return our calls.’ He turned to Bart Knaggs. ‘Remind me to talk to Trek.’

The wheels were moving, and later that week two new Treks were on their way to Halifax, one for our ride and one to act as backup should I crash. Their combined cost was $15,000.

- Taken from Screaming at the Sky by Tony Griffin with TJ Flynn

I HAVE BEEN asked several times if I have been disappointed by Lance Armstrong since news broke that he was handed a lifetime ban from sport, having chosen not to contest charges brought against him by the US Anti-Doping Agency.

I travelled to the slopes of Alps to watch the 2005 Tour de France fly by in a splash of colour and to study this loud Texan called Lance Armstrong on his way to winning his sixth Tour. Two years later this was the man from whom I would often draw inspiration after I decided to cycle 7000km across Canada in my father’s memory.

He kept me focused on a daily basis as I trained through the Canadian winter in a small laboratory in Halifax, Nova Scotia. You see, back in 2007 when he became an integral supporter of that cycle, we decided to donate $225,000 to Livestrong to be spent on researching a cure to cancer. In a way that began as Lance Armstrong persuading Trek to agree to sponsor the 7000km Ride for the Cure grew into a three-year journey of cycling, fundraising, dreaming culminating in sampling Austin each September for the annual Livestrong Challenge to celebrate the result of another year’s fundraising.

Did I feel let down by the news that Lance Armstrong was not going to contest the charges made against him? The answer is no.

But there were more questions; If Lance Armstrong was to have doped did I not feel let down by him? The answer is no.

This could be explained by my making a perfect hero out of this man but if you look beyond the hero, as I do in this article you will see that my assertions above are not due to being blinded by hero worshipping. The answer is much more complex and much simpler than that depending on your personal view and how you choose to look at it. The ying and yang of life.

What I am about to write may appear that I am sitting on the fence but if read in the spirit with which it is intended you will see what I am saying strikes to the heart of us all.

What defines who we really are?

I am not out to convince anyone. I am merely speaking my truth. If Lance Armstrong did use performance enhancing drugs I would not think any less of the MAN. Do I condone doping in sport? Of course not but I capitalise the word man because for me our identities are not as simple as athlete, actor, artist, comedian, bricklayer, whatever label you want to attach. If Lance did dope I would say ‘Man, you should have come out and been straight with people’ but I wouldn’t think any less of the man. And here is why.

Tony Griffin shows Armstrong what a sliothar is in Austin. Pci: Tony Griffin.

Imperfect – Imperfect – Human

Lance is like the rest of us. Imperfect.  Flawed. Human. The time I spent with him left me respecting the man but also realising that someone this driven and determined would make a wonderful friend but a ruthless enemy. Perhaps this is what made him so successful on the bike.  Perhaps that’s what was driving his legs when he looked back at Jan Ulrich, his crucifix dangling round his neck and went for it.

Perhaps this carried him through his fight with cancer when doctors told him to prepare for death. It was this shadow side of his fight with cancer, the gift of the painful experience, that grit and ruthlessness, which at times threatened to consume him and those closest to him. The selfishness of an elite athlete and the caring of a cancer survivor; an unlikely mixture.

You see, that morning I spent in Austin with Lance, his daughter was crying because she could not bring her little piggy to school. And I saw the caring side of the man. The side that became visibly upset when he heard a woman had been killed on the same stretch of road a few days before we cycled it together that day in Austin.

I look at Lance Armstrong and see two people; I see the cyclist and I see the man. And I admire the man and what he endeavoured to do with his fame. Many see it as ego, I choose to see it as someone who cares about people who are suffering. I see two people. I see the layers of identity and it is never as simple as any one thing defining you in its entirety.

Father

A memory: a woman from Nova Scotia calls me and asks can I have Lance write to her husband who is in a raging battle with cancer. Lance is his hero. Several days later that man receives a hand-written letter telling him that no matter what don’t give up. A year later I meet that woman. Her two year old daughter is clinging to her leg, crying.

Her daddy has died. The woman whispers to me through her own tears that that letter had given her husband great comfort.

Armstrong means something to cancer sufferers that only those who have battled the disease can understand. In the midst of the fear, in the eye of the chemotherapy-fuelled storm Lance was a sign of hope. He was a living embodiment that the disease could be beaten. Not only beaten, but having overcome it and gone on to tell his story, have a family, build a life, he was evidence you could go on to thrive.

My own father drew strength from this. You may love or hate Lance Armstrong, you may not know why you carry those feelings but what you must accept is that he was a signal of hope for many. A lighthouse beaming the possibility of survival across an anxious and fretful sea. It is this part of Lance Armstrong that I believe in. It is this part to his identity that means I do not and will not feel let down by the very human, flawed Texan.

Tony Griffin presenting the Texan with a cheque for the Livestrong Foundation. Pic: Tony Griffin.

The Truth

Apart from those closest to Lance only he himself really knows if he used performance enhancing substances on his way to winning those seven Tours. And it is always the truth we meet when we turn out the lights at night that is the fiercest judge. Truth can’t be dissected or alchemically transformed in to something it is not. You can try and tell yourself anything you want to make yourself feel better but ultimately your heart knows the truth. And evading it can feel like a self-imposed prison.

I was reminded of this lately when I heard an interview with Tyler Hamilton — the baby faced assassin of the Tour de France. He spoke of his utter relief, the feeling of a suffocating weight being lifted from his narrow elite-cyclist shoulders when he admitted he had used performance enhancing substances. If Lance did use, he knows the truth.

If he didn’t, then the truth will be enough in his quiet moments to set him free.

Tony Griffin is an athlete, charity activist, speaker and author. He is a former All-Star hurler with Clare, who now does extensive charity work for organisations such as SOAR. In 2010, he released his authobiography ‘Screamin At The Sky’.


Read next:

Comments (68 Comments)

  • This article seems to leave out some of the most important aspects to Lances character. He was, and is a bully, a control freak who ruined peoples careers and lives to win those titles. He used his power not for solely charitable reasons but for a selfish ones. To win at any cost and increase his profile (and pay packet). He did donate money and time to his charity but this is a secondary point when put along side the huge negative aspects to the story. But as propaganda goes this article is way up there, the mentioning of caring for his kids and bringing them to school……well done Lance, you care and love your kids (what a MAN!!). But I suppose the ‘believers’ are in denial and will hang onto any positive aspects to the MAN, possibly loving his family brining his kids to school, which most right thinking people do, is one of the few remaining ones. I think its time to wake up Tony and if your are writing an article try telling the whole story and not just the one your fed by Lance.

    Reply
  • This is tripe, no one, particularly a parent should condone doping no matter how ‘nice’ someone is!!!

    Reply
  • Steve 06/10/12 #

    I can’t believe people are still using “if”

    Reply
  • Tony doesn’t matter if he comes across as the nicest person on earth, is a great amount of charity work and is also a great family man. The fact is his fame and fortune comes off the back of his cheating and bullying of people, especially fans who believed and followed his career. I hope he keeps up his charity work but it’s a lot easier to do good works when you are in a privileged position, that also gives him the opportunity to give his family a much better lifestyle but when it comes from years of continual cheating it will always be tainted. So will the sport he professes to love

    Reply
  • ConorGe 06/10/12 #

    A couple of things: would Tonys attitude be different if it was a Tipperary hurler who had beaten him in a few championship matches was caught drug taking.
    If Armstrong has not told the truth about his drug-taking I would want to be having a good look at the accounts where my charity money has gone. It is also a high possibility that his use of drugs e.g.testosterone-like drugs that was a major factor in his testicular cancer

    Reply
  • Tony, I was at your fundraising night before you left Ireland.
    Id love to spend an hour here writing a detailed response to most of your points, as vague and esoteric as some of them are, but I just dont have the time.
    You, like me, are an avid cycling fan, so Im sure you’ve been reading and listening to the same coverage that I have.
    For a man who was well able to see through the numbing self serving parochialism and occasional cynicism of the little Hitlers in the GAA, Im more than surprised that youve been taken in by Armstrong.
    Have you let this man become an emotional crutch, as so many others have, despite all that we know now?
    Youre one of the good guys, but youve taken the wrong fork in the road here.

    Reply
  • I wonder if like Jimmy Savile, people kept quiet because of the great charity work he did and because of his fame. Yes, he might have been pleasant to talk to and helpful to Tony Gibbs, but it does seem that he cheated and lied and brought cycling as a sport into some disrepute. A bit naive, Tony even if loyalty is a good trait.

    Reply
  • Steve 06/10/12 #

    Tony if you don’t think any less of Lance Armstrong THE MAN then traits like honesty and integrity obviously mean nothing to you.

    Armstrong THE MAN is a liar, a cheat and a bully.

    Reply
  • Getting ahead and winning at any cost is what has our country bankrupt. Our politicians epitomise this behaviour and like Armstrong they get hugely paid for it. It doesn’t make it right.

    Reply
    • The article is making excuses for something that really can’t be justified. If he stole money and gave it to charity you wouldn’t justify it. He effectively stole his success but happened to be nice with it.
      In saying that cycling is a dirty sport.

      Reply
  • Success from Doping then involving oneself in subsequent charity work doesn’t stack up from my perspective

    Reply
  • It’s not that simple, to just brush aside what he did is either naive or you support cheating. I was really disappointed and let down when I heard the news. He has ruined his name and impacted negatively on the charties and good work he has done. Why can’t people call it as it is and then move forward, why all this “ah sure he’s grand etc.., etc..”, it OK he cheated! He still does great work, I commend him for that.

    Reply
  • @Rory he says right in the article that he does not condone using drugs in sport, tune in fella !!

    Reply
    • Brendan , MaverickPaw, this will come back to haunt you. You are effectively saying that you believe everything that is said. Wow. I believe there is a lot of ambiguity here. Nothing more , nothing less. If this is not so what is the point of the article. Armstrong has said he is not going to contest these serious allegations any more. Why ,then , should he be shown any sympathy at all. He was a role model for kids. Read the article , guys.

      Reply
  • I’m an admirer of Tony and the work he has done however I am very disappointed with his attitude towards Armstrong. For me Armstrong showed his true colours in his treatment of people like Emma O Reilly and Betsy Andreu, two people who spoke out against him. Tony says in the column ”we decided to donate $225,000 to Livestrong to be spent on researching a cure to cancer.” I think Tony and some other people who have commented here should take a look at this ….. http://fraudbytes.blogspot.ie/2012/01/lance-armstrong-investigation.html. Most of the money the foundation collects is actually spent on Cancer awareness and almost nothing goes to actual research. Also for the people who like to go with the ‘they were all doping’ argument should have a read of this…http://www.sportsscientists.com/2012/08/the-armstrong-fallout-thoughts-and.html. If you want to celebrate his achievements then celebrate the fact that he was the best Doper!

    Reply
  • Anyone interested in this listen to newstalk now, a true tour winner talking the truth

    Reply
  • Do you still believe in the tooth fairy and Santa Calus?

    Reply
  • Those who know about such things say the biggest problem in prosecuting conf-men is getting their victims to admit they were duped. Nobody likes to admit they’re being played as a fool, Tony.

    Reply
  • Pani 06/10/12 #

    Every saint has a past. Every sinner a future.

    Reply
  • Naive Tony

    Reply
  • Is Tony approving of the use of drugs in sport? Can’t decide from the article. Maybe , maybe not.

    Reply
  • Delusional. Cheat. Goodnight.

    Reply
  • tl;dr?
    Author is a gullible bumpkin.

    Reply
    • @kahana
      When youve made as much of a man of yourself as Tony Griffin has, you can come back with something less insulting and more substantial.than that, you cretin.
      I might disagree with him on the issue being discussed here, but Tony is an absolute gentleman and an exemplary human being.

      Reply
    • Hey John, the author has put his opinion out there and there’s a comment section here, so people can say what they want based on the piece he’s written. We don’t all know him personally.

      Reply
  • Never forgive Lance for his bully boy tactics. He is not only a cheat but a pusher/dealer who bullied and bribed his way to 7 Tours. Allez Kimmage, Walsh and Lemond. Shame on the UCI.

    Reply
  • I’m don’t mean to be disrespectful but this article really is a pile of manure

    Reply
  • Sandy 06/10/12 #

    It’s just disappointing. He was such an example to us all. Not anymore…

    Reply
  • Birds of a feather…

    Reply
  • I guess the opinions people form are based on whether they think you can separate the “MAN” from his actions? If Lance had been found to have doped after his first Tour de France win… would his livestrong charity be what it is today? For cancer sufferers there is no doubt that he is an inspiration because the fact that he fought and beat cancer is not up for debate. I don’t hate the man because I don’t know him, any opinion of mine is based only on whether he doped to win all those tours or not. For me, if he did, then all of the fame and adulation (and the intrinsically linked success of his cancer charity) is tainted. It shouldn’t be written off or discounted but it is tainted… furthermore I think that this is a very strong reason for Lance to never admit (if he did) it. He sees first hand the good that the charity does and for that name to be tainted with an admission of guilt would surely affect donations.

    Reply
  • Great article Tony, I can understand where your point of view is coming from. But the fact is Lance Liestrong used EPO , a drug developed to fight cancer, to cheat and win, claiming prize money and all the trappings success brings. The irony being that the drug he used to become successful and thus raise his profile, enabling him to start his foundation and help the global fight with cancer, was developed to fight that very disease.
    I think that is extremely questionable on morale grounds, never mind the possible fraud against sponsors and fellow clean competitors whom he duped out of prizes and the trappings of success.

    Reply
  • People need to cut Armstrong some slack. The only difference between Him and the others was that he got caught (or indeed wasn’t , depending on how you look at it). He came back from testicular cancer to win arguably the toughest sporting event in the world seven consecutive times. Anyone who thought this was possible without enhanced intervention is simply delusional. Why should he be stripped from his titles when the very people he beat we’re surely doping as well. Therefore a level playing field. The same goes for many other sports where athletes are clearly breaking the thresholds of human possibility.

    Reply
    • james 06/10/12 #

      Oops! Just read your comment :-)

      Reply
    • Most of his rivals were caught at different stages. The fact that *everyone* was cheating doesn’t make cheating OK. It seems to me that you are suggesting that all sports should allow competitors to risk their life and health in order to win – it’s only catering for a “level playing field” after all.

      I don’t know about you, but I don’t want that for myself or my son who may decide to get involved in sport in the future.

      Reply
  • james 06/10/12 #

    The whole thing is a joke because 99% of these cyclists are doping, if they don’t dope up they don’t make the grade. They are ALL cheating. If you don’t think that’s true then do some research, ask questions, use the Internet. Lance Armstrong was singled out. The guy is an amazing athlete, if the field was level ( i.e. all the cyclists he competed against were clean, including him) he would have won the same races, been as successful, but unfortunately it’s not a level playing field: if you don’t dope up you don’t make it. That’s the reality of the situation, it’s a sad reality but it’s just the way it is.

    Reply
    • You say the only difference is that he got caught, which is factually incorrect. Most if not all of the rivals he was beating at the time have failed drug tests and have served bans. Also if you look into the Festina affair and what happened subsequently you will see that part of the reasons others started back doping was because Armstrong was doing it and getting away with it. Had the authorities stripped him of his first tour win, as the should have done when he failed that test, the problem of drugs in cycling would have been much less in that decade when Armstrong “won” all his tours.

      Reply
    • And where does it leave competitors that want to compete but don’t want to take drugs?

      Reply
    • You have no clue what you’re taking about

      Reply
  • The UCI and the WADA are still awaiting evidence to support the accusations from the USADA. it’s a witch hunt. Nothing more. Than man passed 100′s of drug tests and most of the USADA’s claims are based on testimony given by others for a reduced ban from the USADA. Not to mention the millions he’s helped through his cancer research.

    Reply
    • What crap, two of the doctors that lances “charity” fund were involved in the USI dipping board no wonder he passed the tests as he funded the doctors who made the tests and they made them so he could pass them

      He is the biggest ever sports cheat

      Reply
    • There was no test for EPO abuse at the beginning of his monumental rise. Hard to fail a drug test where the drug can’t be detected. He then switched to auto transfusion, so no EPO positive result. He did an incredible amount for fight against cancer, but I just wish he’d come clean.
      The other thing is that even if everybody doped, it’s not necessarily a level playing field. No longer about who trains the hardest and wants it the most. It’s about who trains hardest AND has the better physiological response to the drugs.

      Reply
    • Well Jay, if your gonna be something you may as well be the best at it. Contador hadn’t half the talent of Lance and he was caught red handed and welcomed back to saxo bank with open arms. As yet the USADA hasn’t come across with the evidence which is just as fishy as Lance’s decision not to challenge them. Regardless I still think he’s accomplished some remarkable things on and off the bike.

      Reply
    • The initial tests were just for haematocrit concentration. Once below 50% then the cyclist was ok. Other measurements were not used in official testing so really it’s a surprise that anyone was caught. High hct, then get some saline iv to dilute it. On retrospective analysis, Lance’s samples are highly suggestive of doping but can’t be formally used. There’s also the issue of retrospective prescriptions to cover up positive tests. In Lance’s case, the use of a steroid.
      As for the UCI and McQuaid, they always seemed to be happy with what ever was going on as long as it was kept quiet and nobody made waves. Lance was very good for cycling as well as cancer.

      Reply
    • Niall 07/10/12 #

      Would you ever cop on to yourself for the love of god. He doped. End of. He was caught after the 99 tour and it was hushed. Fact.

      Reply
    • Fact eh?? nice of the USADA pick you to share their evidence with. They just have just let him go on to win the rest after 99 so. Maybe they aren’t that bad after all?

      Reply
  • james 06/10/12 #

    Mary: all these pro cyclist are on hot sauce. You can all live in yer little dream worlds if ye like but the fact remains. Educate yourselves.

    Reply
    • Fair enough. I don’t think every cyclist is on drugs. Mite be naive but I’d like to think wiggins wasn’t. My point was that even if they are all injecting, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the best cyclist wins. Maybe you could educate me…

      Reply
    • James, what do you mean by hot sauce? Do you mean that they are doing what they can to enhance their performance or are “all these pro cyclists”s taking substances that are on the banned list?

      Don’t get me wrong, there’s a big problem there. I just want to know what you mean.

      Reply
  • james 06/10/12 #

    He is no better it worse then the rest of the pro cyclists, they’re all at it, red thumb all you like it doesn’t change that fact, read up on it before you cast a stone.

    Reply
  • did the drugs help him get rid of the cancer?

    Reply
    • Some say they gave him cancer as he was injecting drugs into his groin area

      Reply
    • Do you mean did his use of drugs, post 1999, clear up his cancer in 1997 or so? Don’t think so.

      I don’t remember reading this in his case, but EPO is used to treat some cancer patients. Some treatments leave patients low in red blood cells and EPO boosts red blood cells. It’s possible that it was, but I don’t know for certain.

      Reply
  • Great charity work first of all, no one should knock him for that. No one should make overgeneralisations about a persons character because of some bad decisions regarding a bad end to a cycling career. Professional cycling is rife with doping, not a huge surprise to be fair.

    Reply
  • Lance doped. Most of the peloton did at the time. If you didn’t then you were left behind. Most people can deal with that, It is what he done off the bike is the problem. He was/is a bully and a serial liar. He has tried to discredit and ruin anyone who has told the truth about him.

    The fact people keep saying he never failed a drug test is naivety at it’s best. He failed a drug test and it got covered up. The usada have said that they retested blood samples and they have proof he doped. The fact that he bought the UCI a doping machine is the biggest irony of all. Tyler Hamilton told a story of how when his new team became a threat to USPS Lance rang the UCI to get the testers on Hamiltons case.

    Reply
  • RIP Moon man <3

    Reply

Add New Comment