The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

English town to burn Lance Armstrong effigy

Edenbridge in Kent burns a different celebrity effigy every year.

Artist Frank Shepherd puts the final touches to his creation of Lance Armstrong.
Artist Frank Shepherd puts the final touches to his creation of Lance Armstrong.
Image: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire/Press Association Images

HIS CAREER IS in ruins and now an effigy of Lance Armstrong is about to go up in smoke.

The disgraced American cyclist has been chosen as the latest celebrity to be burned in effigy during an English town’s nationally famous Bonfire Night celebrations.

Edenbridge in southeast England has built a 30-foot (9-meter) model of Armstrong, who was stripped recently of his seven Tour de France titles for doping offenses.

The effigy, to be burnt Saturday, sports a sign saying “For sale, racing bike, no longer required.”

Towns across Britain light bonfires and set off fireworks on Nov. 5 to commemorate Guy Fawkes’ failed plot in 1605 to blow up Parliament.

The bonfires are traditionally topped with an effigy of Fawkes but have been decorated with contemporary figures over recent years.

Previous Edenbridge effigies include comedian Russell Brand and soccer star Wayne Rooney.

Insurers ask Lance Armstrong to repay bonus millions>

Read next:

Comments (29 Comments)

  • Jimmy saville should have pipped him to the post!

    Reply
  • The point here is regardless of whose effigy they burn it is a disgusting idea. Full stop

    Reply
    • Damocles 01/11/12 #

      The Irish have a tradition around this time to dress up their children as ghosts, goblins and cowboys and send them out to terrorise the local neighbourhood demanding sweets under threat of attack, they then burn every spare scrap of wood in the country.

      Burning a dummy seems mild by comparison.

      Reply
  • I never knew so many people were cycling fans.

    Thank goodness people aren’t just jumping on another bandwagon, right?

    Reply
  • Completely over the top..the guy is guilty as sin and was caught..let it go.

    Reply
  • I’d say that’s what Lance looks like after all the drugs..

    Reply
  • The Simpsons writers point out how quick the townsfolk can become a Mob
    Any excuse to burn those who weaken.
    Would those of you in the Mob without sin step forward and light the first match and be a great example to young kids ,
    ‘But what about the children ‘.

    Reply
  • “Artist Frank Shepherd puts the final touches to his creation of Lance Armstrong”

    I think they’re using the term “Artist” very loosely there. Looks nothing like Armstrong, hence the name on the jersey to prevent any confusion for the neanderthals in the village.

    Great example for all in this day & age. They should be proud.

    Reply
  • Really weather the man is guilty or innocent, this is a a joke right!!! Ok its not but why oh why have we resorted to burning an effigie of a cyclist what will this prove!!

    Reply
  • Despite it all did he not contribute quite a bit to charity?

    Reply
    • Ellenor,so if I cheat and win prize money,sponsorship and world wide notoriety, its ok if I do some charity work to balance it out?

      What about all the guys that lance beat,are you sure that they wouldn’t also have done some good,if given the same platform as winner of he tour de France?

      He cheated ,and cheaters cannot be allowed to prosper otherwise what’s the incentive not to cheat?

      Reply
    • “Despite it all did he not contribute quite a bit to charity?”

      As did Jimmy Savile.

      Reply
    • His Livestrong charity kept most profits; donating a small proportion to charity.
      Yes, he definitely contributed. But he used Livestrong as a front to make money. Put it this way; not too many TdF winners can afford an $11m private jet

      Reply
  • Mob mentality…….. Losers

    Reply
    • I suppose you were one of the clowns 2 months ago who cried “witch hunt” when Lance chose not to defend himself…

      Reply
    • @nial
      I was, and still am. He may have cheated in a sport that is doped up to its eyes in cheaters. So what? A high percentage of sports people would cheat if they thought they get away with it. Sheep mentality.

      Reply
    • No Niall I just think that a community that find it ok to burn a effigy of someone they don’t agree with are LOSERS………

      Reply
    • probably all have webbed feet

      Reply
    • Agree with Green Monkey. I have no time for Lance Armstrong but this kind of thing is representative of modern society proclivity for building people up only to knock them down at some point in the future. The kind of idiots who want to burn an effigy of a well known person are more than likely the same people who would have blown a whole lot of unnecessary smoke up that person’s ass when they were riding high (pun not intended).

      The world could do with a more measured approach to success and failure. But I won’t hold my breath.

      Reply
  • It’s so ‘inspiring’ to see armchair athletes, never achieved anything in their lives, basically those who are out of breath walking to the fridge, stop shoving snack foods in their face for 2 mins to yell obscenities and accusations at an achiever they’re clearly subconsciously jealous of.

    Does it make you feel better about your lives? Good for you. I’m happy you’re so…. Simple.

    Reply
  • Lets deal with the facts here shall we, he cheated to gain success. This is his job, he gained huge salaries etc on the back of this and his cheating prevented others from success. I think the lines get muddied when its sport but at the end of the day he is a professional athlete. In essence he cheated to become successful in his chosen career. The question is, should he be held accountable like any other professional when caught cheating in their chosen career?

    The charity defence or the fact that others are doing it is completely irrelevant. This is about him and the fact he got caught cheating on the job.

    The posters here who defend him are typical of the post thirty something’s who suddenly decide to take up sport and bedeck themselves in Lycra and suddenly everyone else is a mere mortal and can’t say anything about their poster boy.

    Facts: he has been proven to have cheated in his chosen career.

    Question: should he be held accountable like Madoff, Leeson etc. we won’t go there with certain Anglo people.

    Reply
    • NOTHING has been proven. He decided not to defend himself. This does not mean a person is guilty. Statements were collected but still no positive tests. It’s really that simple.

      I want those positive tests

      Simple

      Reply

Add New Comment