The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Sunday 26 May, 2013

Debate: Does ‘Blade Runner’ Oscar Pistorius have an advantage?

The South African runner will become the first amputee to compete at the Olympics in London.

Pistorius competing in Manchester last May.
Pistorius competing in Manchester last May.
Image: Tony Marshall/EMPICS Sport

IS MAN-MADE MATERIAL superior to muscle? Are those blades better than real legs?

Oscar Pistorius, the double-amputee runner, is taking the issue of disabled vs able-bodied competition into new territory as he prepares for the London Olympics.

His inclusion on South Africa’s team clears the way for him to become the first amputee runner to compete in the Olympics. And because it’s the sporting world’s biggest stage, his participation is likely to fire up the long-running debate over whether his flexible, carbon-fiber blades give him an unfair advantage.

Pistorius, 25, runs on Cheetah Flex-Foot blades, J-shaped limbs that are 16 inches (41 centimeters) long and weigh a little over a pound each.

Pistorius, whose lower legs were amputated when he was a baby after he was born without the fibula bones in his shins, has a personal best in the 400 meters of 45.07 seconds — almost two seconds off Michael Johnson’s world record — and ran a 45.20 this year, both inside the top Olympic qualifying time.

Never before has a disabled person been such a threat to the able-bodied in a sports event.

“There are tens of thousands of people with the same prosthetics I use, but there’s no one running the same times,” Pistorius wrote in a column in a British newspaper last week after he was chosen to run both the individual 400 meters and the 4×400 relay in London.

“You’ll always get people who have their opinions on whether I should be competing in London, but they can’t explain my times.”

The Blade Runner doesn’t just want to show up at the London Games, flash his photogenic smile and wave, and then retire graciously and let the top runners get on with it. Pistorius wants to be on the track among the eight finest runners in the world when the gold medal is decided on August 6.

“It’s a personal dream of his to run in the final at the Olympic Games,” Pistorius’ coach for all his career, Ampie Louw, told The Associated Press. “It’s not qualifying only.”

Pistorius told the AP: “My goals are just to be able to look back at my career and know that I didn’t let my talent go to waste. I’m just trying to prove to myself that I can be the best that I want to be.”




YouTube credit:

Sports engineer David James, a senior lecturer at England’s Sheffield Hallam University, disagrees with Pistorius’ inclusion in the Olympics on both scientific and ethical grounds.

“Sport is hard-nosed and brutal and bloody and has no place for sob stories. People want Oscar to run and do well. However, will they think the same if he wins?” James said. “I predict a backlash if he wins anything. They will attribute that performance to the blades. I think there would be real implications if he won.”

Pistorius’ case was settled — legally anyway — in 2008 when sports’ highest court lifted the ban from able-bodied events imposed on him by the International Association of Athletics Federations.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport said that Pistorius probably gets some advantages from the springy, curved blades, but also suffers some disadvantages, and they even out in the end.

James doesn’t agree.

“To say he doesn’t have an advantage is stretching it,” the sports engineer said. “When he’s up to speed, he is more efficient than someone with muscle and bone. He can relocate his legs faster because they are lighter.”

Hugh Herr, an associate professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an expert in biomechanics and bionics who has conducted studies on Pistorius, agreed with the decision to reinstate Pistorius, saying there is no evidence the blades give Pistorius an edge.

Pistorius’ leg speed is quicker than that of some other athletes but not all of them, Herr said, meaning he’s “not abnormal.” And in terms of the energy he uses and the way he tires, there is, crucially, no difference, Herr said. Pistorius is probably at a disadvantage because he cannot hit the ground as hard as other athletes, the professor said.

Herr said Pistorius was forced to come up with a different running style from a young age because he had no lower legs, and developed bigger hips as a result. Those hips, and to a lesser extent his knee joints, are the key to his running, Herr said.

The view that he’s a robot that doesn’t fatigue is nonsense,” Herr said. “The science is immature. We don’t know very much, but what we do know says there’s no overall advantage for Pistorius in a 400-meter race.”

Sports ethicist and philosopher Ivo van Hilvoorde of Free University in Amsterdam said the South African athlete represents the shifting boundaries between able and disabled sport.

“We are used to thinking of disabled as less,” Van Hilvoorde said, “but it could be the other way round. Oscar Pistorius is a nice example of this.”

Poll: Will you support Cian O’Connor?

Cutting back: Just the 396 in China’s Olympic team

Read next:

Comments (36 Comments)

  • If able bodied athletes are precluded from the Paralympics for obvious reasons, shouldn’t the same ruling apply to the Olymipcs only in reverse? No don’t get me wrong, I think it’s amazing – in fact it is incredible – that he can run such fast times, and it only goes to prove human intelligence and ingenuity in developing the “blades”, but perhaps with the pace of scientific development etc, that one day he (or another paralympic athlete) will run faster than an able-bodied athlete. That poses fundamental questions for both the Paralympic and Olympic ideals.

    Reply
  • In fairness those wheelchair lads have been winning the marathon for ages.

    Reply
  • It’s not like his times are 10 seconds faster than any other 400m runner. He’s been training for years and only recently made the qualifying time. Personally, I think he’s an inspiration. I don’t think he’ll win, but he’ll certainly make it interesting!

    Reply
  • Bryan 11/07/12 #

    I think he’s brilliant, physically and mentally.

    Reply
  • At full speed one study said that he gets a rotational advantage. It didn’t take account of the fact that he gets the slowest start, is slower on bends and struggles in rain. Oscar, like Jason Smyth is a sensational inspiration.

    Reply
  • I think it’s great that he is in the Olympics. However the whole ethos of the Olympics and its amateur style status seems to be in question when you see the likes of roger federer in the Olympics and other professional athletes.

    Reply
  • gerry 11/07/12 #

    Go Oscar go! On another note does he have a weigh advantage or disadvantage over other runners due to his missing legs considering the muscle mass of sprinters in their legs

    Reply
  • He doesn’t get athletes foot..that’s gotta be an advantage..

    Reply
  • E D 11/07/12 #

    What a legend, I hope he makes the podium

    Reply
  • If he’s allowed in the Olympics then he shouldn’t be allowed to compete at the Paralympics.

    Reply
  • If they suspect him of taking drugs he won’t have a leg to stand on.

    Reply
  • its an interesting debate, he is disadvantaged in the sense that he can’t apply the same force into the ground to generate speed, hence he could not compete at the shorter sprint distances.
    but given the weight difference and lack of muscle mass he probably has less lactic acid build up giving him more O2 to his lungs giving him a stamina advantage so it all balances out either way it makes for intriguing viewing let the man race.

    Reply
  • When it comes to human conditioning, 20 years of science doesn’t trump millions of years of evolution. Best of luck to him

    Reply
  • Will we see a new line of “running shoes”, which would offer the same advantages, without costing a leg and a leg?

    Reply
  • mart_n 11/07/12 #

    Do black people have an advantage over white people? Apparently they do since they have a slightly higher center of gravity (hidden height). The way I look at it is, they’re all people.. if they’re good enough to compete against one another at the top level then so be it.

    Reply
    • It’s not just the person though, the equipment also plays a part.

      I guess this is a ver clear cut issue, as somewhere in the Olympic rule book there will be a clear cut definition of the types of equipment runners can use.

      Reply
    • If your looking at sprinters then “black” runners have an advantage over “white” due to a larger number of fast twitch muscle enabling greater speed. The reverse is true with “slow” twitch muscle enabling greater endurance.

      Its why in the majority the best sprinters are “dark” and the best long distance are “light”

      Hopefully Blade runner will do well (and even win if he is good enough)

      Reply
  • Does he have an advantage? I think so but I would LOVE to see him win. Having had no legs for pretty much his whole life and to fight to be in a position to compete at this level, against the finest able bodied athletes in the world is just monumental in itself

    If he wins, and I hope he does it’ll be possibly one of the finest achievements in sporting history

    Reply
  • Fair play to him for overcoming his disability to compete in athletics but what’s next a Lou and Andy and a jet powered wheel chair in the 100m?

    Reply
  • He should be banned from competing….This will open the door to the enhancement of abled bodied athletes with what will be little short of bionics.It makes a mockery of the sport,and is not in the spirit of competition.It seems kind of obvious…Athletes should have two legs for running…not blades.I can just Imagine a few years down the line..’ nice legs….thank you! they are ferari design,Did’nt like the mclaren and the redbull’s just don’t have the pace’…Its a fkn joke!!

    Reply
  • If he is winning all the races and breaking world records then yeah..but since he came on the scene he has not really won much so the answer is NO

    Reply
    • I don’t think anyone could give a definitive answer until the bio mechanics of his running technique are extensively studied by sports scientists, perhaps something he may agree to after the Olympics. The obvious advantages are that his legs are lighter and thus ‘turnover’ faster. There may also be a slight from the blades as he drives through on each stride but I think this is countered by the fact that able bodies sprinters drive through each stride by extending each leg behind them, which Pistorius doesn’t have the capability to do. He also doesnt have power being transferred through from the calf muscle as the foot is extended on each stride so it probably balances out to a pretty negligible advantage/disadvantage overall. Though sprinting is a sport that deals in 1/100ths of seconds so there is always going to be debate.

      Reply
  • Paul 11/07/12 #

    So they’re going to let the man with the bionic arm into javelin disc and hammer events… Where will it end?

    Reply
  • If another athlete thinks he has an unfair advantage, would they want to swap places with him? Can’t see too many runners chopping their legs off to win races.

    Reply
  • He should stay in the Paralympics. Fair play to him but he is using series technology there to enhance his ability to run fast which is unfair to the able bodied athletes. So i dont agree with it.

    Reply
  • If able bodied athletes were to use those blades, or other technology,( remember those springy things that were all the rage 10 years ago?) – would they be disqualified from participating in a race?

    Reply
  • Totally unfair, that lad is just bouncing along with no effort at all and his feet can’t get tired either.

    Reply
  • Should be in the Paralympics, he is technically handicapped.

    Reply

Add New Comment