The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Armstrong’s lawyers want apology from ’60 Minutes’

Former team-mate Tyler Hamilton insisted Armstrong doped throughout Tour de France winning streak.

Lance Armstrong: denies any wrongdoing.
Lance Armstrong: denies any wrongdoing.
Image: Thao Nguyen/AP/Press Association Images

THE LATEST LANCE Armstrong ‘doping’ controversy rumbles on.

Today attorneys for the seven-time Tour de France champion demanded an on-air apology from “60 Minutes” after the head of Switzerland’s anti-doping laboratory denied allegations he tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs at the 2001 Tour de Suisse.

In a letter sent today to CBS News chairman and “60 Minutes” executive producer Jeff Fager, lawyer Elliot Peters said the May 22 segment about Armstrong was built on a series of falsehoods, and he accused the reputable CBS show of sloppy journalism.

“In the cold light of morning your story was either extraordinarily shoddy, to the point of being reckless and unprofessional, or a vicious hit-and-run job,” Peters wrote. “In either case, a categorical on-air apology is required.”

CBS News spokesman Kevin Tedesco said  he couldn’t immediately comment on the letter, but said: “We consider this the most thorough investigation into doping in the sport of cycling ever done.”

Former teammate Tyler Hamilton alleged in the piece that Armstrong talked about using the banned blood-booster EPO to prepare for his third Tour de France in 2001 and the International Cycling Union helped him hide a positive test at the Swiss race.



Last week, the head of Switzerland’s anti-doping laboratory, Martial Saugy, denied allegations Armstrong tested positive for performing-enhancing drugs during the 2001 Tour de Suisse.

Saugy said his lab did find suspicious levels of EPO in four urine samples from the race Armstrong won, but he didn’t know if any belonged to the seven-time Tour de France winner.

Armstrong has repeatedly denied doping and has never tested positive. Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles are investigating an alleged doping program in Armstrong’s teams.

“60 Minutes” also reported UCI officials brokered a meeting involving Armstrong and Saugy’s World Anti-Doping Agency-accredited lab, which tested the Swiss race samples.

Saugy told the Swiss daily Neue Zurcher Zeitung last week that he met with Armstrong and then-U.S. Postal Service team manager Johan Bruyneel, but not in Lausanne as Hamilton claimed and unconnected to a suspicious test result.

Peters added the show’s producers were alerted by Armstrong’s camp prior to the show’s airing that the Swiss-related allegations were false and provided evidence to refute them.

“What is particularly disturbing is that ’60 Minutes’ had access to the true facts, could easily have verified them, and apparently chose instead to broadcast untruths and then layer innuendo on top of the falsehoods,” Peters said.

- additional reporting AP

Lance Armstrong denies new doping allegations by former team-mate

Read next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • Perhaps they should try labelling the urine samples so that they know which individuals they came from-or does the whole team just piss into a bucket?

    Reply
  • Mano' 01/06/11 #

    Armstrong is a disgrace, he’s consistently avoided doping tests, then bullies anyone that questions or investigates the many ‘irregularities’ in his career. Its disgusting when he uses the fact that he had cancer to drum up sympathy and support for himself and at the same time use it to denounce anyone who questions him. Saw him do this once to a journalist that kept questioning him over refused, missing and delayed dope tests, only for Armstrong to practically insinuate the journalist was attacking him because he had cancer!!
    After losing several members to cancer I felt sick listening to Armstrongs bullshit about his ‘struggle’.
    Lance Armstrong has proven himself to be a lying, bullying cheat. Hes a disgrace to sports.

    Reply
  • I heard he was taking that much EPO that he grew 4 additions testicles.

    (Joking I am)

    Reply
  • I hope the relevant authorities go through Armstrong for a shortcut*. there is nothing I despise more than a hypocrite.

    * assuming he is indeed guilty of being a dishonest scumbag :o

    Reply
  • While an increasing amount of circumstantial evidence and allegations is coming to the fore in the last few years, I think it’s a dangerous game to presume he’s guilty without concrete proof. He was one of the most tested athletes in history in his prime and never failed a sample. We all know cheating is endemic in cycling- the doping committee needs to get their act together. It just makes me a little uneasy that everyone is ADAMANT Armstrong is guilty. Why didn’t the snooker community accuse Steve Davis or Stephen Hendry of taking beta blockers or other relaxant drugs when they annihilated everyone around them for 20 years collectively? Or Mike Tyson of taking steroids when he won the world title at the age of 19? Or how about Michael Phelps winning 8 gold medals in Bejing, setting new world records in 7 of these races (surely to most this was a seemingly “impossible” feat).

    Do I believe, on balance, that Lance Armstrong doped? Probably. Am I spitting bile at the sports news every time there’s a new allegation? No. Because deep inside I want to believe it’s possible for someone to return from an illness like his and achieve such incredible things, while always playing fair…

    Reply
    • “…and never failed a sample”

      Correction: he was never convicted of failing a sample.

      It amazes me that so many of of his past team mates are lying be saying he took drugs… They must either be very jealous or trying to make a quick buck… all of them, who testified under oath…

      Reply
  • What’s the difference really if he took dope or not, he is still legend. Others took it as well but that was him who was winning. I hope you don’t believe there are many clean sportsmen these days, where principles are being exchanged for big money.

    Reply
    • The difference is that LA has lied under oath, misappropriated government funds, wrongly sued individuals, taken money from his fans in order to defend himself, used his ill-gotten fame to enhance his own business endeavors, slandered his contemporaries & corrupted the sport & the sports governing body to further his own career while destroying that of others*

      *If! if he is guilty

      Reply
    • Yeah got your point Paul, I commented too quickly I am afraid not getting inside of the story. My fault!

      Reply

Add New Comment