The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Armstrong tells supporters: Don’t cry for me

The 40-year-old former professional cyclist made his first appearance in public since deciding not to fight doping charges.

LANCE ARMSTRONG HAS told his supporters not to shed any tears over the fact that the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has stripped him of his seven Tour de France titles.

The 40-year-old American cyclist was making his first public appearance since announcing that he would not fight doping charges against him, finishing second in a 36-mile mountain bike race in Aspen, Colorado.

“Nobody needs to cry for me. I’m going to be great,” Armstrong told reporters.

“I have five great kids and a wonderful lady in my life. My foundation is unaffected by all the noise out there.

“I think people understand that we’ve got a lot of stuff to do going forward. That’s what I’m focused on and I think people are supportive of that. It’s great to be out here,” he said.

Armstrong may have given up the fight to clear his name but still, conversely, maintains his innocence and claims there is a witch-hunt against.

He has held on to his major sponsorship deals for the moment, as well as the support of many senior figures within the sport, while cycling’s global governing body – the International Cycling Union – are demanding that USADA hand over its evidence.

“It’s more about staying fit and coming out here and enjoying one of the most beautiful parts of the world, on a beautiful day, on a very hard course,” added Armstrong, whose guilt or innocence could ultimately be decided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

“Some may say you’re a little sick to spend your free time doing stuff like this. I had a good time.”

Resurgent Garcia seizes solo lead at The Barclays >

Read next:

Comments (37 Comments)

  • A rough week for the armstrong’s. First lance and then Neil, I’d say stretch is keeping the head down!

    Reply
  • Well done to him for his work on cancer. Life isn’t fair. But sport should always be. Let’s not forget that.

    Reply
    • ‘life isn’t fair but sport should always be’ – love it, well said.

      is there, by the way, any actual proof that he used drugs? Or is this another case of guilty until proven innocent?

      Reply
    • He was caught later in his career, his team mates were all willing to testify that he was taking them at the time too and was encouraging others to as well.

      That said, you’re right John, life ain’t fair and to battle cancer and then go on and do what he did and then use his fame too achieve the things he did is still very admirable. Hes not evil, he was just cheating when everyone else was.

      Reply
  • peter 26/08/12 #

    He used his fame and now tainted success to help fund a global fight against one of the worlds biggest killers in cancer. In my opinion if he helps one family overcome cancer through some of his charity’s funding or research then what he did or didn’t do doesn’t really matter. He wasn’t the first man to dope and won’t be the last but no one can take away the good he has done.

    Reply
    • His fame was based on cheating to win at all costs. He’s a cheat, a liar, and a hypocrite of the highest order, and a major disappointment to people who supported, followed and looked up to him for years. He is no role model. Also he owes Kimmage an apology. Lastly he’s taking the easier route now by not contesting the charges for the sake of damage limitation. I hate cheats.

      Reply
    • spot on and to be fair the fact that most of his major rivals down the years tested positive afterwards what were the odds ever gonna be he did it all on his own?? be interesting to see how far down the list they Will have to go to for those 7 years he won to find a rider who was clean with no hint or suspicion of performance enhancers. not a role model as an athlete, terrible advertisement for the sport of cycling but as a tireless worker for his cancer charity he has to be respected.

      Reply
    • http://www.bicycling.com/sites/default/files/uploads/BI_LANCE.pdf
      There’s a lovely graph in this article which might interest you, Cornelius.

      Reply
  • I just feel sorry for all the non-doping cyclists who thought they were in a fair race.

    Imagine busting your ass to cycle 3,000 kilometres across the Alps only to find out later that the winners won because they cheated, that must feel really deflating knowing that you effectively trained your hardest for what was ultimately a complete waste of time.

    But no-one seems to think of his competitors who played fair and square, its sad really.

    Reply
  • peter 26/08/12 #

    I wonder how many weren’t doping

    Reply
  • Tom L 26/08/12 #

    Cry for him ? He has done very well off from his Tour de France victories. He has a personal net wealth of $125 M. He has given up the fight to clear his name because of the amount of evidence against him and by what would come out in the trial. Perhaps he should give most of his ill gained fortune to the cancer charity ?

    Reply
  • He is a cheat… he is a hypocrite ….the evidence is overwhelming. His work for cancer research is admirable. Some are starting to move him into the robin hood type hero thing.He was a cheat well before he was a hero, and now he is a liar too.

    Reply
  • Cheat!

    Reply
  • The same people trying to take away his achievements of winning the Tour de France are the same idiots who try to say he never landed on the moon. Conspiracy theorists are stoopid.

    Reply
  • I dunno… Yes I agree Armstrong took performance enhancing drugs but I also agree that it is a witch against him too.. Allegedly his team mates also took the same drugs as him but the cycling federation will go easy on them because of their testimony against Armstrong.. Not fair either..

    Reply
    • Guilt is a commodity in the states….time /money…..you get something for it if you are in the right place and they (The judiciary) feel a trade benefits justice.This applies to all national interest inquiries, sporting ,business …whatever.

      Reply
  • Errrr… He’s never tested positive, this is all built on the allocations witnesses… Competing athletes who benefit directly from making such accusations

    It flies in the face of any concept of justice. A witch-hunt is apparently back in fashion and innocent until proven guilty no longer applies

    Reply
    • Brian 26/08/12 #

      Did results not come back from tests with far higher than normal EPO in his system? I thought those tests and the testimonies of ten former team mates was the basis of the case?

      Reply
    • Do a little bit if research on the subject.

      Reply
    • Basically harassment Andrew. Because they couldn’t prove it with positive tests they built up a gaggle of cheaters & liars with nothing to lose.

      Wait until you see the amount of books released by these cheaters after this. They’ll all cash in on the witch hunt.

      I’m constantly accused of being blind & a fanboy but these poor unfortunate fools don’t realize that I’m not actually a fanboy but I just witnessed a modern day witch hunt where as a guy passed all the tests that were required but the USADA weren’t happy so they had to get dirty & cheat themselves.

      Great example for all the other athletes out there. Really puts faith in the systems in place.

      Why bother pi$$ing into a cup when it doesn’t matter? It’s like me going to my local & drinking Non Alcoholic beer all night then jumping in to my car & driving home. A bunch of people call the Gardaí & I get stopped. I fly through the test with no problem but get arrested & charged anyway because a bunch of people said they seen me drink 6-7 bottles of beer.

      Sound familiar? I was drinking, but it wasn’t what everyone thought.

      Reply
  • is it possible that he is actually innocent?i mean,we are just going on the word of certain people without any actual proof . also,if former teammates are going to testify.. maybe sour grapes?i doubt armstrong went around bragging about the drugs to teammates.i dont understand how we all assume his guilt with not a shred of evidence.maybe he is sick of defending himself and how energy sapping it must be.remember this is going on for 10 years with no evidence of any description.

    Reply
  • It wasn’t him that was on drugs, it was his bike…

    Reply
  • There is no judge, there is no jury, there is no charges and this is NOT A TRIAL. The USADA is not a legal body and cheating in a sport is not a crime

    They are a professional body retracting awards they gave. This is the point I’m making they can do whatever they feel like, they arent bound legally to prove anything.

    It’s the sporting equivalent of your boss taking back your employee of the month award and firing you after someone makes an allegation that you were stealing

    Reply
  • Lance is the victim….another victim of a ruthless witch hunt.

    Reply
  • Well if he didn’t cheat and didn’t become world famous would his charity of helped so many or even existed?? So maybe just as well he did cheat?

    Reply
  • I’m really disappointed because Lance was openly an atheist. Most (all?) elite athletes are religious. Believing there is a supernatural power on your side gives you the edge psychologically. C’est la vie.

    Reply

Add New Comment